Loading…
We meet with the customer's IT, finance, operations, and commercial leadership to understand the integration landscape from each side. This is how we surface the requirements that don't appear in any document.
We document the current system landscape, existing integrations (if any), and the systems that will need to interact with Odoo. Every interface gets cataloged with direction, volume, and criticality.
We design the target integration architecture, applying patterns proven in production: API-first where it fits, events where async is needed, batch where it makes sense, and middleware where it reduces ongoing maintenance burden.
Bring us the constraint. We'll bring the team.
Most failed Odoo programs share the same origin story: integration was scoped late. Implementation begins, modules get configured, and integrations get added piece-by-piece as discovery surfaces them. By the time the third missing interface appears, the timeline has slipped, the budget is contested, and the program is in dispute. The Integration Assessment exists to prevent that pattern.
The assessment is fixed-scope, fixed-deliverable, and fixed-price. Two to four weeks, depending on stakeholder count and landscape complexity. The output is a documented decision package your team can use — independent of whether QueuesHub or any other partner ultimately delivers the implementation.
An inventory of every system Odoo will need to interact with — directly or indirectly — including the data ownership of each system, the integrations that already exist (if any), and the constraints those existing integrations impose.
A documented architecture covering the integration patterns recommended for each interface (real-time API, event-driven, batch, middleware), the deployment model (Odoo.sh-first by default), and the security and observability baseline. Architecture Decision Records explain why each major choice was made — not just what was chosen.
Every interface cataloged with: source and target systems, data flow direction, volume profile, latency requirement, criticality tier, and the integration pattern selected. The catalog is the artifact your implementation team works against.
Each interface scored S/M/L/XL based on number of entities, transformations required, sync direction and latency, error-handling requirements, security and access constraints, volume, test coverage depth, and operational criticality. Effort estimates are derived from the scoring — not assumptions.
Interfaces grouped into Phase 1, 2, and 3 based on business criticality, technical dependencies, and risk profile. Each phase has milestones, dependencies, and a risk register. The roadmap is what your team uses to plan resources and budget.
The assessment is the gate. Once you have it, you can decide: proceed with Odoo at the planned scope, adjust the scope based on what surfaced, or pause to address foundational issues. You can also use the assessment to qualify partners — including QueuesHub — for the implementation phase that follows. There is no obligation to use the same team for delivery.
We score each interface S/M/L/XL based on entities, transformations, latency, error handling, security, volume, and criticality — then estimate effort against that scoring and produce a phased delivery roadmap.
We deliver a documented set of findings, an interface catalog, an architecture decision record, an effort estimate, and a roadmap. Your team can use this directly to plan, budget, and decide — independent of who delivers the implementation.